Although 3D printing is rapidly transforming the nature of the manufacture of the products, however many concerns regarding 3D printing laws need to be taken into consideration. In this respect, it is necessary to clear civil legal responsibility and intellectual property laws in the accordance of 3D printing.

The reason why a separate field of 3D printing law emerge is that the technology is rapidly impacting the 3D printing field. Thus, the 3D printers are highly effective in creating tailored surgical implants, pills, prosthetic limbs, parts of machinery, and replicas of museum relics and object and items of weaponry.

3D-Printing

Defining in detail the concept and usage of 3D printing

By employing different digital files, the 3D printers can create different objects. The machine is able to create different objects and replicas through the use of pharmaceutical materials and plastic. Also, the experts in 3D printing field make use of a specific software that they install in their desktop PC and design the product they desire to print. Afterwards, the machines that portions the object into different layers so that they can print the image on the top of one another in order to design the object.

Thus, to be very precise the concept of 3D printing and the product designing is just the same as the artist would use pen and paper to design an image. Although the machinery is expensive but over the time, when the growth of 3D printing will increase, it will become much cheaper despite that fact that the nature of the 3D machine is highly customised and refined.

So let us now look at the different 3D printing laws with respect to different requirements:

The laws concerning to IP issues or copyright

Whenever the expert in the field of 3D printing decides to create the 3D object, the full report shows he or she needs to obtain copyright and the right to claim his authority of his own creation. The 3D printing expert can only obtain such rights if he devices an electronic layout of the object and a 3D printer. It is because it is very easy for anyone to take initiative and design your creativity himself with the tools and claim his authority of something that is truly yours.

If there is no law to safeguard the individuals’ creativity through the 3D laws, then what would prevail before us is a black market that carries series of products that have been wrongly seized by the people illegally. Thus, there is will be no authority to whom the designers in the 3D printing field can turn to seek protection for their respective masterpiece.

Legal responsibility of a specific product

There is no surprise in the fact that 3D technology in printing is rapidly being employed to make guns that are usually replicas of the original design. Although 3D technology in printing is highly efficient in making the guns by undergoing the process of downloading a specific design of fun, printing it and firing it, the possibility of mishap is always there. It can happen that the gun gets misfired and the user can be injured and harmed in the process. At that time the main question arises as to who will take the responsibility of the mishap and who is accountable to the authorities? Thus, who will come ahead and accept his legal responsibility; the originator of the design of the gun or the printer than printed the design layout? Moreover, the question too arises as to whether the law authorities should show inclination towards the consumer protection laws or introduce strict measures in the field of 3D printing laws.

Through the 3D printing there is always a way for ground-breaking investment opportunity

The concern for the majority of the small-scale businesses is that they are seeking opportunities for investment where they can employ the 3D printers to produce the look a likes of the proposals and products that show to their clients. The necessity of such investment is that through 3D printing, the business owners will get an accurate and precise replicas of their produces that are very close to real. In this clients will realise that businesses that are inviting them to collaborate and sign the contract are no joke and are authentic in all aspects. Thus, in this respect, if the small scale businesses are indulging in 3D printing investment with the hope to attract more clients are making the right use of the technology. Here, at this point, no law can restrict them as long as they are doing everything within the legal constraints.

Therefore, with all the information about the nature of 3D printing and its related features, one thing is very clear. The concept of 3D printing is not wrong. In fact its wrong usage may require the individuals and companies to become subject to strict 3D printing laws.